Aptarimas:Adomas Mickevičius: Skirtumas tarp puslapio versijų

:The problem is wrong article. Adam Mickiewicz wasn't "lenkų-lietuvių kilmės poetas". There wasn't neither such nationality, nor such ethnicity. Adam Mickiewicz was Polish poet, this is visible in many his views. Mickiewicz identified himself as Polish, as poet of divided Poland. This is clearly visible in his mesianistics views about Poland, see Norman Davies at least. Exists lectures in College de France where Mickiewicz clearly separate himself from Lithuanian population, viewing to it as vanishing. Also article is wrongly categorised - now is classified as "Lietuvos poetai". Sorry, this is nonsence. Do you think Mickiewicz is the same as Juozas Erlickas, Jurgis Baltrušaitis etc? See [http://lt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategorija:Lietuvos_poetai] It's nonsence, because it's unhistorical, unscientifical add Mickiewicz to this category. In historiography exists conception that separates historical Lithuania of Mickiewicz times - Litwa, form Republic of Lithuania - Lietuva. Distinction between mentioned terms is recognised by Polish, Bielorussian, Lithuanian historians. Formally Mickiewicz was Russian poet, but he was disloyal Russian subordinate. Anyway, he never lived in so called Polish-Lithuania commonwealth. What I'm explaining is known for decades, almost century. Even in Soviet times, even in Lithuanian encyclopedia was recognised that Adam Mickiewicz was Polish poet. What happened? Do you think that the desire to beautify the history is useful, wise? The problem is that mislead Lithuanian users goes to English Wikipedia and disturbs it. Best regards. --[[Specialus:Indėlis/84.15.109.176|84.15.109.176]] 19:01, 22 kovo 2011 (EET)

::This actually makes sense.--[[Naudotojas:Snooker|Snooker]] ''[[Naudotojo aptarimas:Snooker|apt.]]'' 19:36, 22 kovo 2011 (EET)