Aptarimas:Šakotis: Skirtumas tarp puslapio versijų
Ištrintas turinys Pridėtas turinys
Nėra keitimo santraukos |
SNėra keitimo santraukos |
||
Eilutė 3:
:Well, バウムクーヘン is Baumkuchen, and シャコティス is Šakotis in Japanese. And in Japanese, Šakotis, which is a Lithuanian traditional cake, is not usually regarded as the same as Baumkuchen, because バームクーヘン is regarded as a German cake in Japan. They are probably similar, but not the same. Baumkuchen might have been originated from Šakotis, which is now considered as the Lithuanian cake, but it has different form and features today.<br />I am convinced that Šakotis shouldn't be mixed up with Baumkuchen. I know it is similar, but it is not the same. That's why Lithuanian wikipedia has two articles ([[Baumkuchenas]] and [[Šakotis]]), doesn't it? Unfortunately, Japanese wikipedia still has only one article ([[:ja:バウムクーヘン]]), and it does not have the article [[:ja:シャコティス]] yet; however, I am strongly convinced that the article should be created in order to inform the uniqueness of the Lithuanian traditional cake, which is different from the German cake. I mean, there should be two articles ([[:ja:バームクーヘン]] and [[:ja:シャコティス]]) in Japanese wikipedia too.<br /><small>P.S. Thank you for beginning this discussion in English. It is quite helpful for me :)</small> --[[Naudotojas:H-JAM|H-JAM]] 23:56, 31 gegužės 2010 (EEST)
It sems that you make a logic point - the article should discuss the Baumkuchen as similar, yet seperate entity.
|