Protingas sumanymas: Skirtumas tarp puslapio versijų

Protingo sumanymo šalininkai įrodinėja, kad tai yra mokslinė teorija ir siekia fundamentaliai pakeisti mokslą, priverčiant jį pripažinti antgamtines jėgas. Mokslinėje bendruomenėje priimtas [[konsensusas]], kad tai nėra mokslas.<ref name="unscientific">See: 1) List of scientific societies explicitly rejecting intelligent design]2) Kitzmiller v. Dover page 83. 3) The Discovery Institute’s A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism petition begun in 2001 has been signed by „over 700 scientists“ as of August 20, 2006. A four day A Scientific Support for Darwinism petition gained 7733 signatories from scientists opposing ID. The AAAS, the largest association of scientists in the U.S., has 120,000 members, and [http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2002/1106id2.shtml firmly rejects ID] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20021113213410/http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2002/1106id2.shtml |date=2002-11-13 }}. More than 70,000 Australian scientists and educators [https://web.archive.org/web/20060115091707/http://www.science.unsw.edu.au/news/2005/intelligent.html condemn teaching of intelligent design in school science classes] [http://ncseweb.org/media/voices/science List of statements from scientific professional organizations] on the status intelligent design and other forms of creationism. According to ''[[The New York Times]]'' „There is no credible scientific challenge to the theory of evolution as an explanation for the complexity and diversity of life on earth“. {{cite news